FEATURED ARTICLE
Australian coal hauler at strip mine
Giant coal hauler in Australian strip mine. Some two hundred years ago, the world began to transition from a dependence on wood to coal, which itself was later largely eclipsed by petroleum and natural gas by 1950, Both were even more energy dense, high-quality forms of energy, but ultimately non-renewable on any human time scale. As cheap oil grows scarce, nations like the U.S., China, India and Australia are expected to rely increasingly on 'clean' coal technology to replace dwindling petroleum reserves, a move that is likely to exacerbate global warming.

Oil and the Energy Quality Dilemma

MP3 audio of presentation by Cutler Cleveland at 2006 Sustainable Energy Forum on Peak Oil and the Environment.

By EV World

Oil is king when it comes to energy density per volume of fluid. Nothing, absolutely nothing even comes close, certainly not natural gas, ethanol or hydrogen, especially hydrogen. And that’s the problem.

In this 25-minute talk at the 2006 Sustainable Energy Forum on Peak Oil and the Environment in Washington, D.C. this past May 7-9, Boston University professor Cutler Cleveland walked the audience through the problem of finding equally energy-dense substitutes for petroleum, and the bottom line is, nothing really comes even close. 10;00

Even more troubling is the declining value of EROEI, or “Energy Return On Energy Invested”, which means that we are having to “invest” increasing amounts of energy to find, extract and deliver energy. Cleveland noted, for example, that at one time it took the equivalent of just one barrel of oil to recover 100 barrels or a ratio of 1:100. Now that number is down to somewhere between 1:20 and 1:10.

When it comes to ethanol from corn, the actual EROEI, whether positive or negative -- depending on your input assumptions -- is simply lost in the margin of error, Cleveland contends and isn’t even close to oil’s return on energy invested.

Both hydrogen and electricity are high quality fuels whose value for doing specialized work -- try running your laptop or microwave on gasoline -- makes the relative premium we pay for converting fossil fuels, nuclear fission or erecting wind turbines to convert another form of energy into electricity worth the cost, even though we let power producers off the hook for ALL the costs of power, passing it on instead to future generations in the form of greenhouse gases, acid rain, mercury poisoning and radioactive waste.

Cleveland’s point is that the we have steadily relied on increasingly higher quality forms of energy, but ones that are not easily replaceable once depleted; all the while adding population and building out vast infrastructures that will become increasingly difficult to maintain.

To listen to his presentation, use either of the two MP3 players found in the right-hand column or download the file to your computer hard drive for later playback on your favorite MP3 device. EV World thanks the organizer of the Sustainable Energy Forum for granting us permission to record this historic event.

EVWORLD Future In Motion Podcast

Download MP3 File

Times Article Viewed: 8536
Published: 11-Jul-2006

READER COMMENTS

blog comments powered by Disqus