SYNDICATED NEWS
PHOTO CAPTION: Alberta tar sands mine requires large energy and water inputs to extract and refine into a useable petroleum product.

New IMF Study Considers Global Economic Impact of Peak Oil

Ezra Klein summarizes the findings of new IMP report 'Oil and the World Economy: Some Possible Futures'.

Published: 28-Oct-2012

> The world isn’t going to run out of oil anytime soon. But there’s still concern among various geologists and analysts that our oil supply won’t grow as quickly or as easily as it used to. We’ll have to resort to harder-to-drill oil to satisfy our crude habits. More expensive oil. That would push prices up. And high oil prices could act as a drag on growth.

This, at any rate, is the basic idea behind “peak oil.” And there’s some reason for worry. Between 1981 and 2005, world oil production grew at a steady pace of about 1.8 percent per year. All was well. But starting around 2005, oil production appeared to plateau. And, since demand for oil kept rising, especially in countries like China and India, that caused prices to soar. Oil doesn’t get much cheaper than $100 per barrel these days. And that, some economists worry, has acted as a drag on growth around the world.

So how bad would it be if peak oil was really upon us? That’s a question that two IMF economists try to tackle in a new working paper, “Oil and the World Economy: Some Possible Futures.” (pdf) The authors, Michael Kumhof and Dirk Muir, don’t make any definitive predictions about how the oil supply will evolve. Rather, they try to model a number of different scenarios in which oil does become more scarce and the world tries to adapt.

<< PREVIOUSNEXT >>
RELATED NEWS ITEMS

Russian-developed Yo-Mobile combines natural gas and ultracapacitor-based hybrid drive.

Simit Patel sees two transportation 'fuels' as benefiting the most from the expected rise of gasoline prices in the United States this summer.

According to the author the EROI for tar sands oil is 4.

Forbes contributor Stephen Leeb offer a primer on the EROI, energy return on investment and its implications for the future.

US Defense Secretary Panetta tells troops climate change is a national security risk.

New report co-authored by U.S. Center for Naval Analyses and the London-based Royal United Services Institute recommends more effort into fighting global warming than securing supplies of oil.

READER COMMENTS

blog comments powered by Disqus