By EVWorld.com Si Editorial Team

Poland's SM42-6D hydrogen-powered locomotive.
By EVWorld.com Si Editorial Team
In the early autumn of 2025, Poland unveiled its first hydrogen-powered locomotive, the SM42-6Dn - a retrofitted diesel engine now humming quietly on a short test route. The announcement was met with a flurry of optimism, the kind reserved for technologies that promise to reconcile industrial ambition with environmental virtue. But beneath the gleaming surface of this fuel cell-powered machine lies a more sobering reality: hydrogen rail, while symbolically potent, remains economically and logistically fraught across Europe and Asia.
The SM42-6Dn is not a purpose-built marvel of engineering. It is, rather, a pragmatic retrofit of an aging diesel locomotive, designed to run on hydrogen fuel cells and lithium-ion batteries. Its test route spans a modest ten miles—hardly the stuff of revolution. Yet its existence signals something more strategic: a bid by Polish engineers to remain relevant in a continental race toward rail decarbonization. In this sense, the locomotive is less a leap forward than a rehearsal, a way to gain fluency in a technology that may or may not define the future.
Germany, often seen as the vanguard of European rail innovation, offers a cautionary tale. In 2018, the country made headlines with the launch of the Coradia iLint, the world’s first hydrogen-powered passenger train. Developed by Alstom, the trains were deployed on a 100-kilometer stretch of track in Lower Saxony, connecting the towns of Cuxhaven, Bremerhaven, Bremervörde, and Buxtehude. The route, largely non-electrified and previously served by diesel trains, was an ideal candidate for hydrogen experimentation.
But the promise began to unravel in the Taunus region near Frankfurt. In 2022, the local transit authority ordered 27 Coradia iLint trains under a $500 million deal, intending to replace diesel service on several commuter lines. The Taunus network serves a mix of suburban and semi-rural communities, with ridership composed of daily commuters and students traveling to Frankfurt. The terrain is varied, and the infrastructure aging. Hydrogen trains, with their long range and independence from overhead wires, seemed a perfect fit.
Yet by late 2024, the fleet was pulled from service. Mechanical failures, delays, and refueling complications plagued operations. Hydrogen stations were located at chemical plants with limited access, and the trains struggled to meet the reliability standards of daily commuter service. In response, older diesel trains were temporarily reinstated, and the region began exploring battery-electric alternatives. These trains, while limited in range, offered higher energy efficiency and could be charged using existing grid infrastructure.
Bavaria, meanwhile, has adopted a more cautious dual-track strategy. Siemens Mobility’s Mireo Plus H hydrogen trains are set to launch in 2026 on a 32-kilometer route between Mühldorf, Tüßling, and Burghausen. The region’s approach is pragmatic: hydrogen for non-electrified corridors, batteries for the rest. A localized electrolysis plant in Mühldorf will supply green hydrogen, sidestepping the logistical bottlenecks that hampered the Taunus project.
Japan, with its highly electrified network and cultural emphasis on punctuality, has shown little interest in hydrogen trains. South Korea has invested in hydrogen buses and industrial transport, but rail remains a secondary focus. China, ever the pragmatist, continues to expand its electrified high-speed rail network, leaving hydrogen largely unexplored.
Hydrogen fuel cells convert energy at roughly 25 percent efficiency, compared to 90 percent for battery-electric systems. Green hydrogen—produced via electrolysis using renewable energy—is expensive and scarce. Infrastructure costs are high, and safety concerns persist, particularly in tunnels and densely populated areas.
| Technology | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrogen Fuel Cell | Long range, fast refueling, zero emissions | Low efficiency, high cost, complex infrastructure |
| Battery-Electric | High efficiency, low operating cost, quiet | Limited range, long recharge time, heavy batteries |
| Hybrid (Diesel + Battery) | Flexible, lower emissions than diesel | Still emits CO₂, not fully clean, complex systems |
Poland’s SM42-6Dn is less about revolution and more about rehearsal. It’s a strategic move to keep Polish engineers competitive and engaged with emerging tech. Hydrogen rail isn’t dead—but it’s not ready for mass deployment either.
The real future of rail will likely be a blend: electrification where feasible, batteries where practical, and hydrogen where nothing else works. Poland’s locomotive is a rehearsal for that future, not its arrival.

Articles featured here are generated by supervised Synthetic Intelligence (AKA "Artificial Intelligence").
Become a patron and help spread the good news of the world of electric vehicles.
Not yet ready for primetime.
© EVWORLD.COM. All Rights Reserved. Design by HTML Codex